One of the hardest leadership decisions is determining when coaching has run its course and when it’s time to help someone exit the team. Great leaders want to believe every person can succeed with enough support, enough clarity, enough encouragement, or enough time. Sometimes that’s true. Sometimes it isn’t.

The danger is that leaders often stay in coaching mode long after the evidence suggests the person either cannot or will not perform at the level the role requires. In doing so, leaders unintentionally damage the team, erode accountability, and exhaust themselves emotionally.

There are three principles that help leaders navigate this difficult decision with clarity and compassion.

1. Separate the Person from Their Performance

One of the greatest mistakes leaders make is confusing someone’s value as a human being with their effectiveness in a role.

A struggling employee is not a bad person. They may be intelligent, kind, loyal, hardworking, and deeply respected. But none of those qualities automatically mean they are capable of succeeding in a particular position.

Leadership requires emotional maturity to hold two truths simultaneously: You can genuinely care about someone, and they still may not belong in the role.

2. Look for Strategic Ownership of Problems

The single biggest indicator that coaching still has potential is whether the person demonstrates strategic ownership.

High-performing team members do not merely acknowledge problems. They own them. They think proactively. They anticipate consequences. They adapt. They seek solutions before being told.

But there is another side to this principle that leaders must understand: leaders cannot own the employee’s problems for them.

Many leaders fall into the trap of rescuing under-performers. They step in repeatedly, solve problems the employee should solve, compensate for missed deadlines, smooth over relational conflict, or carry the emotional burden of the employee’s lack of ownership. Initially, this feels compassionate. In reality, it often creates dependency.

When leaders continually absorb the consequences of someone else’s performance problems, they unintentionally remove the very friction necessary for growth.

Growth requires ownership. Maturity requires responsibility. Learning requires consequences.

If a leader constantly intervenes, the employee never fully experiences the connection between their choices and their outcomes. The leader becomes the coping mechanism instead of the coach.

At some point, coaching must require the employee to carry the weight of their own development. Otherwise, the leader is not developing the person — they are enabling the pattern.

3. You Cannot Confer a Benefit on an Unwilling Participant

No matter how gifted the coach, transformation requires participation.

You cannot make someone hungry to grow. You cannot force self-awareness. You cannot manufacture internal motivation. You cannot impose ownership on someone who refuses responsibility.

You cannot care more about someone’s growth than they do.

Getting Someone Off the Bus Is Not Failure

Many leaders interpret termination or transition as evidence they failed as coaches. Leadership is not about keeping everyone forever. The primary responsibility of leadership is stewardship of the mission, culture, standards, and team. Last comes the individual because the Mission is Mother meaning our the highest in our hierarchy of priorities.

So let me leave you with this encouragement. Earlier in my career I had to terminate someone who was very connected to our Board. I was in my early 20’s so it felt very risky, but I knew it was the right thing for the organization. I did go through with it and many years later that employee came up to me at a conference and let me know that termination was the beginning of them turning their life around. They were now in an incredible position living their cause and purpose and their best life. It was a gift to me because often we don’t get that closure this side of eternity knowing the rest of the story. All things for good is an adage that is encouragement to do the right thing for the organization and it just may be the catalyst for that struggling employee as well to go find their true cause and purpose.

Chris Comeaux, 
President / CEO of Teleios Collaborative Network

Leadership Immersion
October 5-9, 2026
Register Now

Teleios University (TU)
Discover More
Register Today!

An organizational model that allows nonprofit hospices (Members) to leverage
best practices, achieve economies of scale and collaborate
in ways that better prepare each agency to participate in emerging 
alternative payment models and advance their charitable missions.